Standout

Every other vendor sits above the platform.
Nebbos is the platform.

One page. One argument. The category difference every enterprise buying committee needs to see before the shortlist gets drawn.

Book a demo

01 · The frontier labs

Sell you a model. Never see the workload.

OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta — the model providers train the world’s best generalists. They cannot see your workload, your operators, your systems of record. They cannot govern a call because the call never reaches their runtime. They are downstream of the platform.

02 · The application vendors

Wrap a model in a UI. Governance ends at the wrapper.

Every AI-native application vendor sits above the model AND above the platform — they call a frontier API and render the response. Their governance ends at the API boundary. What the call touched, what it consumed, what it committed — opaque to them, opaque to you, only auditable at the model provider they don’t control.

03 · The MLOps platforms

Deploy models. Governance is a monitoring dashboard.

Vertex, SageMaker, Databricks — the MLOps stack governs the model. It does not govern the call. When your compliance officer asks “which decision consumed which tokens under which policy,” MLOps has traces of inference, not traces of governance.

04 · Nebbos

The platform itself. Governance IS the runtime.

Nebbos is where the AI call lives. Every call carries its own audit, its own metering, its own isolation. Every action passes through the approval graph. Every consumption traces to a business decision. Not a wrapper. Not a dashboard. The substrate.

See the position on your workload.

A 30-minute walkthrough of the same workload evaluated against a frontier-lab call, an application vendor, an MLOps platform, and Nebbos. The category difference lands in the differences.